← Back to Reports

Media and Third-Party Coverage on Grizzly Research’s Investigation Into Archer Aviation, Inc. – Grizzly Research LLC

Grizzly Research alleges Archer's Midnight aircraft was delivered twice, with weak production activity and a questioned $6 billion backlog.

Archer Aviation says it delivered its first Midnight aircraft to the UAE.

Grizzly Research says Archer still owns that aircraft, and that it has now supposedly been "delivered" twice. The claim anchors a broader argument that Archer's manufacturing progress, order book, and commercial milestones are overstated relative to what Grizzly's site visits and document review found. Grizzly Research, which holds a short position in Archer, argues the company's Midnight aircraft is unlikely to be certified and that its public narrative has outrun its engineering and production execution.

Ticker: ACHR (Archer Aviation Inc.)
Research Firm: Grizzly Research LLC
Report URL: https://grizzlyreports.com/media-and-third-party-coverage-on-grizzly-researchs-investigation-into-archer-aviation-inc/?ref=shortreport.fyi
Position Disclosure: Grizzly Research states that it, possibly together with members, partners, affiliates, employees, consultants, clients, and/or investors, held a direct or indirect short position in Archer securities or derivatives as of publication.


Thesis

Grizzly Research argues Archer has used shifting language, a quiet factory, and an inflated order book to mask a Midnight aircraft it believes cannot be certified.

  • Shifting Targets: Archer's shareholder letters moved from "6+ conforming aircraft" and early-2024 flight testing (Q4 2022) to "3 conforming aircraft in progress, 6 planned" (Q4 2023) to "piloted, type-design aircraft" language (Q3 2024), progressively softening the original commitment.
  • Testing Never Started: More than 12 months after its original flight-test target, Archer had not flown a single one of the six originally promised conforming aircraft, per Grizzly's review of shareholder letters and earnings calls.
  • Uncertifiable Design, Alleges Grizzly: Grizzly alleges, based on review by unnamed eVTOL, helicopter, and defense-sector experts, that Midnight is technically uncompetitive and unlikely to achieve certification; the underlying technical analysis was not included in the excerpt reviewed.
  • Quiet Georgia Plant: Site visits in June, July, and August 2025 allegedly found "little to no production activity" and only a few dozen cars in the parking lot at Archer's Covington facility, against stated targets of 50 aircraft annually scaling to 650.
  • $6 Billion Backlog Questioned: Grizzly says Archer's roughly $6 billion order book leans on commitments it considers non-credible, including Air Chateau (100 aircraft, up to $500 million), KakaoMobility (50 aircraft), Future Flight Global (up to 116 aircraft), and a U.S. Air Force Agility Prime contract valued up to $148 million.
  • Air Chateau Collapse, Alleges Grizzly: Grizzly alleges the UAE operator behind the 100-aircraft MoU had purchased only one helicopter as of November 2023 and, per Grizzly's findings, has ceased operations.
  • Agility Prime Shortfall: Of the "up to $148 million" Air Force contract, only $33 million had been awarded and $744,796 disbursed; of a $110 million firm-fixed-price component, only $1.3 million had been awarded.
  • Staged UAE Launch, Alleges Grizzly: Grizzly alleges the UAE "Launch Edition" event was a staged hover at a photo-op location using an obsolete aircraft recycled for marketing, diverting engineering resources without generating substantive test data.

Catalysts

  • Type Inspection Authorization and conforming-flight progress: Archer's progress toward Type Inspection Authorization and further conforming-aircraft flight testing, next reported at Archer's upcoming quarterly update, would confirm or contradict Grizzly's claim that no conforming aircraft has flown.
  • 2025 manufacturing output: Delivery against Archer's stated plan to manufacture up to 10 Midnight aircraft in 2025 would test the credibility of Archer's production timeline, whether results show a shortfall or on-schedule builds.
  • Covington facility activity evidence: Further evidence on activity levels at the Covington, Georgia facility would corroborate or rebut Grizzly's site-visit findings of minimal production.
  • Backlog commitment durability: Any validation, cancellation, or removal of the Air Chateau, KakaoMobility, Future Flight Global, or Agility Prime commitments from Archer's backlog would directly affect the credibility of the $6 billion order-book figure.
  • UAE aircraft ownership and delivery status: Clarification of the ownership and delivery status of the UAE Launch Edition aircraft would resolve whether the event constituted a genuine commercial milestone.

Company Response

The source report does not describe any request for comment sent to Archer, nor any response from the company. COMPANY RESPONSE: Not addressed in the source report.


Notable Details

  • Grizzly titles its report "Archer Aviation, The Nikola of the Skies," explicitly invoking the Nikola comparison to frame its allegations of misleading projections and PR.
  • Archer's Chief Technology Officer reportedly described the aircraft as reaching "increasing levels of conformity," language Grizzly says signals the referenced aircraft were not fully conforming.
  • Grizzly contrasts Archer with competitor Joby, which it says is making "tangible and impressive progress on all fronts," though the excerpt provides no specific Joby milestones or data to support the comparison.
  • By its Q2 2025 earnings call, Archer said it was producing six Midnight aircraft with three in final assembly, a production count Grizzly juxtaposes against the absence of any flight test of the originally promised conforming fleet.
  • Grizzly characterizes Archer's defense-market pivot as "desperate," alleging the company lacks the resources to become a credible defense participant, though no specific program awards or budget data are cited in the excerpt.

"the company's strongest feature is its marketing strategy and how it presents itself to investors, not its actual operations."

This appears at the start of Grizzly's technical-failure section, encapsulating its central allegation that Archer's public narrative exceeds its engineering and production execution.


FAQs

What is the Archer Aviation (ACHR) Midnight aircraft controversy about?

Grizzly Research's report centers on Archer's Midnight eVTOL, arguing the aircraft is unlikely to be certified and that Archer has repeatedly revised its production and flight-testing targets since Q4 2022. The report also questions the credibility of roughly $6 billion in claimed customer orders and describes Archer's Georgia factory as showing little production activity during 2025 site visits.

What has Archer Aviation Inc. said about its Georgia production facility?

Archer has stated production ambitions of 50 aircraft annually scaling to 650 annually with Stellantis support. Grizzly Research says site visits in June, July, and August 2025 found "little to no production activity" and only a few dozen cars in the parking lot, a finding the report characterizes as circumstantial rather than documented.

What does Grizzly Research allege about Archer's order book?

Grizzly Research alleges that Archer's approximately $6 billion order book includes commitments from counterparties it considers non-credible: Air Chateau, KakaoMobility, Future Flight Global, and the U.S. Air Force's Agility Prime program. It says Air Chateau's 100-aircraft MoU came from an operator that had bought only one helicopter and, per Grizzly's findings, has since ceased operations.

Did Archer actually deliver a Midnight aircraft to the UAE?

Archer claimed to have delivered its first piloted Midnight aircraft in the UAE as part of a "Launch Edition" event. Grizzly Research alleges Archer remained the sole owner of that aircraft even after the claimed delivery, and describes the event as a staged hover using an obsolete aircraft rather than a genuine commercial handover.

What happened with Archer's KakaoMobility order?

KakaoMobility had committed to 50 Midnight aircraft, according to the report. Grizzly Research alleges the relationship broke down after Archer failed to deliver for a planned Q4 2024 demonstration in Goheung, Korea, and that the commitment remained in Archer's backlog despite the alleged breakdown.

How much has Archer's U.S. Air Force contract actually paid out?

Archer's Agility Prime contract with the U.S. Air Force is described as worth up to $148 million. Per the report, only $33 million has been awarded and $744,796 disbursed, and of a $110 million firm-fixed-price component, only $1.3 million has been awarded.

Has Archer's Midnight aircraft begun flight testing?

According to Grizzly's chronology of Archer's shareholder letters and earnings calls, Archer originally targeted early-2024 flight testing of six conforming aircraft, later delayed to mid-2024. More than 12 months past that revised target, the report says no flight test of any of the six originally promised conforming aircraft had occurred.

Does Grizzly Research have a financial interest in Archer's stock falling?

Yes. Grizzly Research discloses that it, along with possible affiliates, partners, employees, consultants, clients, or investors, held a direct or indirect short position in Archer securities or derivatives at the time of publication, and states it may continue trading Archer securities after the report's release.


Disclaimer: This summary is not primary research and does not constitute investment advice. It is a brief overview of a detailed equity research report authored by the firm, organization, or source referenced in this article or at https://grizzlyreports.com/media-and-third-party-coverage-on-grizzly-researchs-investigation-into-archer-aviation-inc/, which contains extensive evidence, regulatory filings, and analysis; readers are encouraged to review the full report there for a comprehensive understanding. The content provided in this publication is not authored or originated by us — we act solely as a distributor and do not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. This publication is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. Always conduct independent due diligence and consult qualified professionals before making any decisions based on the information contained herein. We disclaim all liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on third-party content, and the views expressed are solely those of the respective source and do not necessarily reflect our own.