MW is Short AppLovin (APP US) – Muddy Waters
AppLovin accused of unauthorized data tracking, creating Persistent Identity Graphs across platforms like Meta and Google, with only 25-35% of e-commerce sales truly incremental, raising significant privacy and performance metric concerns.
Muddy Waters Research, which claims the adtech company has built its business on unauthorized data collection practices and significantly overstated performance metrics. The report alleges AppLovin's impressive growth stems from systematically violating platform terms of service rather than legitimate technological innovation.
Stock info:
- Ticker: APP (NASDAQ)
- Position: Muddy Waters Research is short AppLovin
Why it matters:
- Analysis of 37M unique users shows only 25-35% of AppLovin-attributed e-commerce sales are truly incremental, contradicting CEO Adam Foroughi's claim of "nearly 100%" incrementality
- AppLovin allegedly operates a covert "Fingerprinting 2.0" scheme that collects proprietary user IDs from major platforms like Meta, Google, TikTok, and Snap without authorization
- The company creates "Persistent Identity Graphs" (PIGs) by combining cross-platform data without user consent, potentially violating multiple privacy regulations
- E-commerce client churn rate of approximately 22.6% directly contradicts CEO's claim of "almost no churn"
- AppLovin's business model faces existential risk if major platforms enforce their terms of service, similar to how previous enforcement actions led to 84-87% stock price collapses for companies like Zynga and Cheetah Mobile
Catch up quick:
- AppLovin disguises its tracking tokens, renaming them from "compass_random_token" to "alart" and then "art" to avoid detection
- Only 3.4% of users in the study interacted with AppLovin ads, yet the company claimed attribution for 52% of purchases through aggressive retargeting
- AppLovin's JavaScript pixels collect sensitive checkout data without proper authorization, including cart contents and proprietary platform identifiers
- The company's tracking methods operate server-side, allowing them to circumvent standard platform detection mechanisms
- AppLovin's competitive advantage in ad auctions comes from unauthorized data access rather than superior technology, creating what the report calls a "black edge"
FAQs:
What is the main accusation against AppLovin in the Muddy Waters report?
Muddy Waters alleges AppLovin has built its business on unauthorized data collection practices, violating platform terms of service while significantly overstating its performance metrics. The report claims AppLovin creates "Persistent Identity Graphs" by illegally combining user identifiers from major platforms like Meta, Google, and TikTok.
What evidence does Muddy Waters present about AppLovin's incrementality claims?
The report analyzes conversion log-level data from 776 advertisers covering 37 million unique users and $300 million in revenue. This analysis suggests only 25-35% of AppLovin-attributed e-commerce sales are truly incremental, far below CEO Adam Foroughi's claim of "nearly 100%" incrementality.
How does AppLovin allegedly collect unauthorized data?
According to the report, AppLovin embeds JavaScript pixels on advertiser websites that collect proprietary identifiers from platforms like Facebook, Google, Snapchat, and TikTok. This data is then combined to create detailed user profiles without consent, enabling aggressive retargeting.
What is "Fingerprinting 2.0" as described in the report?
"Fingerprinting 2.0" refers to AppLovin's alleged advanced tracking system that operates server-side to evade detection. The report claims AppLovin disguises tracking tokens (changing names from "compass_random_token" to "alart" to "art") and uses sophisticated algorithms to identify users across platforms without their knowledge or consent.
What potential regulatory or business risks does AppLovin face?
The report suggests AppLovin faces existential risk if major platforms enforce their terms of service against unauthorized data collection. It draws parallels to Zynga (84% stock drop) and Cheetah Mobile (87% stock drop) following similar enforcement actions. Additionally, AppLovin may face regulatory scrutiny under various privacy laws for collecting and processing user data without proper consent.
What is the churn rate among AppLovin's e-commerce clients according to the report?
Muddy Waters claims AppLovin has approximately 22.6% churn among its e-commerce clients, directly contradicting CEO Adam Foroughi's assertion of "almost no churn" during earnings calls.
Disclaimer
This summary is based on a report by Muddy Waters. For the full, detailed analysis, please refer to the original source material: https://muddywatersresearch.com/research/2025/mw-short-app/
ShortReport.fyi is not the author or originator of the content provided in this publication. We act solely as a distributor of the content and do not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Each author retains full ownership and responsibility for their respective content, including any opinions, projections, or analyses expressed therein.
This publication is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. Readers are advised to consult the original source material and seek guidance from qualified professionals before making any decisions based on the information contained herein.
ShortReport.fyi disclaims all liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content provided by third parties. The views expressed in these materials are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of ShortReport.fyi.