By Staff at Shortreport.fyi — 04 Feb 2026

NEW: Ubiquiti Wi-Fi (And Surveillance Camera!) on Epstein’s Island – Jenny Ahn

Ubiquiti Inc. networking and surveillance equipment was used to operate the communications infrastructure on Jeffrey Epstein’s Little St. James island, with FBI raid photographs and Department of Justice records showing UniFi servers, switches, cameras, and recorders capable of supporting roughly 800 to 1,000 devices, indicating an enterprise scale system rather than a basic internet setup; procurement records from December 2017 through March 2019 include emails from Epstein’s technical staff ordering the equipment and UPS shipment confirmations, with no indication that Ubiquiti knew the end use of its products; Hunterbrook Capital holds a disclosed short position in Ubiquiti Inc., citing reputational and market risk tied to the company’s association with Epstein, Sean “Diddy” Combs, and other privacy focused or opaque network operators, including actors potentially linked to Russian interests.

Ticker: UI (Ubiquiti Inc.)
Position Disclosure: Hunterbrook Capital is short Ubiquiti (UI) and long a basket of comparable securities. An affiliate is pursuing private litigation.
Original Research: Hunterbrook Media Investigation

Why Hunterbrook Capital Is Betting Against Ubiquiti:

Extensive Island Deployment: Department of Justice materials and FBI photographs confirm that Ubiquiti Inc. equipment, including UniFi servers, switches, UniFi Video G3 cameras, and a UniFi Video Recorder, formed the core communications and surveillance infrastructure on Little St. James, owned by Jeffrey Epstein.
Enterprise Scale Capability: Digital forensics expert Steven Burgess estimates the installed hardware could support approximately 800 to 1,000 devices simultaneously, enabling large scale data collection such as photos, emails, documents, and device interaction logs.
Procurement Trail: Emails dated December 2017 through March 2019 show Epstein’s technical staff, including Jermaine Ruan and James Ce, ordering Ubiquiti equipment, supported by a January 2018 “LSJ AMAZON LIST” and UPS shipment confirmations showing deliveries sent directly to Epstein.
Additional Controversial Associations: Ubiquiti equipment also appears in Department of Justice exhibits tied to Sean “Diddy” Combs, alongside references to potential Russia Ukraine related users, indicating appeal among privacy focused operators that may include problematic actors.
Privacy Architecture: Ubiquiti’s local control design, which avoids cloud based management and remote profiling, was explicitly preferred by Epstein’s consultants over competitors such as Google, a feature that can also appeal to users seeking to avoid oversight.
No Evidence of Company Knowledge: There is no indication that Ubiquiti knew its products would be used by a registered sex offender or for illicit surveillance, though the associations present reputational risk.
Open Issues: The DOJ has seized storage devices from the site, the scope of retained footage remains unknown, and Ubiquiti has not responded to requests for comment.

NOTABLE FACTS & INTRIGUING DETAILS

Enterprise Hardware, Not Consumer Gear: FBI photographs show server racks and professional grade surveillance equipment with clear Ubiquiti branding, indicating an enterprise level installation rather than a typical home or small business setup.
“LSJ AMAZON LIST” Procurement: A January 2018 document titled “LSJ AMAZON LIST,” referencing Little St. James, itemized Ubiquiti products for purchase, reflecting deliberate planning and sustained investment in network infrastructure.
Privacy Preference Over Google: In a July 2018 discussion, Epstein’s technical consultant James Ce explicitly favored Ubiquiti over Google mesh systems for home Wi-Fi, citing privacy and local control benefits, a notable choice given the surrounding circumstances.
Diddy Connection: A separate Department of Justice exhibit involving Sean Combs references Ubiquiti equipment, suggesting appeal among high profile individuals seeking privacy centric networking solutions.
Russia Ukraine Angle: The investigation points to potential geopolitical considerations, noting possible links to Russian interests within networks that prioritize privacy focused infrastructure.
800 to 1,000 Device Capacity: Expert analysis estimates the deployed system could coordinate between 800 and 1,000 devices, implying the ability to monitor and log activity at a very large scale across the island.
Multi Year Installation: Procurement and installation occurred over at least 15 months, from December 2017 through March 2019, indicating ongoing upgrades and expansion of network capabilities.
Direct Shipments: UPS records confirm shipments from Ubiquiti directly to Jeffrey Epstein, establishing a documented supply chain connection reflected in federal evidence.

FAQs

What company is the subject of this short report?

Ubiquiti Inc. (ticker: UI), a manufacturer of enterprise grade networking and surveillance products, including UniFi routers, switches, cameras, and video recorders.

Why is Ubiquiti stock being shorted?

The short thesis is based on reputational risk arising from documented use of Ubiquiti equipment in Jeffrey Epstein’s island infrastructure, along with associations involving other controversial figures and privacy focused network operators that may include Russian linked interests.

What evidence links Ubiquiti to Epstein’s island?

Department of Justice records and FBI raid photographs show Ubiquiti branded UniFi servers, switches, cameras, and recorders on Little St. James. Supporting evidence includes emails from Epstein’s technical staff between December 2017 and March 2019 ordering equipment, a January 2018 document titled “LSJ AMAZON LIST,” and UPS shipment confirmations addressed directly to Jeffrey Epstein.

How extensive was the network deployed on the island?

Digital forensics expert Steven Burgess assessed that the installed hardware could support approximately 800 to 1,000 devices simultaneously, indicating an enterprise scale system capable of large volume data capture such as photos, emails, documents, and device interaction logs.

Did Ubiquiti know its equipment was being used by Epstein?

There is no evidence showing that Ubiquiti knew the identity of the end user or that its products would be used by a registered sex offender. The issue centers on reputational exposure rather than alleged corporate misconduct.

What makes Ubiquiti products attractive to privacy focused users?

Ubiquiti’s architecture emphasizes local control and avoids cloud based management and remote data profiling. Epstein’s technical consultants explicitly preferred this design over Google mesh systems because it allowed greater privacy and on premises control.

Are other controversial figures linked to Ubiquiti equipment?

Yes. A separate Department of Justice exhibit involving Sean Combs references Ubiquiti equipment, and the investigation points to broader use among privacy centric operators, including those with potential Russia Ukraine related connections.

What was the procurement timeline?

The documented procurement spans from December 2017 through March 2019, beginning with quote requests from tech staff member Jermaine Ruan and continuing through installation discussions and confirmed UPS deliveries.

Has Ubiquiti responded publicly?

Ubiquiti has not responded to requests for comment regarding the use of its equipment on Epstein’s island.

What happened to the data stored on the equipment?

Storage devices from the island were seized by the Department of Justice. Public records do not disclose what specific footage or data was captured or retained.

Is the reporting entity financially involved?

The reporting entity discloses a short position in Ubiquiti stock and a long position in a basket of comparable securities. An affiliated entity is also pursuing related private litigation.

Where can the full investigation be found?

The complete investigation is published by Hunterbrook Media at hntrbrk.com/ubiquiti-epstein/.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

This summary is not primary research but a condensed overview of a detailed investigation conducted by Hunterbrook Media and Hunterbrook Capital. The full analysis, supporting evidence, and corroborating details are available in the original report. All findings, claims, and allegations presented here are attributed to Hunterbrook's research and should be verified by reviewing the complete source material.

Original Author & Research Credit: Hunterbrook Media
Source: https://hntrbrk.com/ubiquiti-epstein/

*Hunterbrook Capital's position disclosure: Short Ubiquiti (UI), long a basket of comparables; affiliate pursuing private litigation.*

Disclaimer: ShortReport.fyi is not the author or originator of the content provided in this publication. We act solely as a distributor of the content and do not endorse, verify, or take responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Each author retains full ownership and responsibility for their respective content, including any opinions, projections, or analyses expressed therein.

This publication is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. Readers are advised to consult the original source material and seek guidance from qualified professionals before making any decisions based on the information contained herein.

ShortReport.fyi disclaims all liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content provided by third parties. The views expressed in these materials are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of ShortReport.fyi.